2025 Supporting Statement 1545-1799-Clean

2025 Supporting Statement 1545-1799-Clean.docx

Interest Rates and Appropriate Foreign Loss Payment Patterns for Determining the Qualified Insurance Income of Certain Controlled Corporations under Section 954(i)

OMB: 1545-1799

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

5




SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Internal Revenue Service

Interest Rates and Appropriate Foreign Loss Payment Patterns for Determining the Qualified Insurance Income of Certain Controlled Corporations under Section 954(i)

OMB control number 1545-1799


1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


In general, a United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation (CFC)

must include in gross income its pro rata share of the CFC’s subpart F income for

each year. Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 951(a) subpart F income includes, among other types of income, foreign base company income. IRC section 954(a)(1) defines the term “foreign base company income” to include, among other types of income, foreign personal holding company income. IRC section 954(c)(1) sets forth the types of income (e.g., interest and dividends) that are considered to be foreign personal holding company income.


Notice 2002-69 (2002-43 I.R.B. 730) published October 28, 2002, provides interim guidance for determining the interest rates and appropriate foreign loss payment patterns to be used by controlled foreign corporations in calculating their qualified insurance income under section 954(i) of the IRC.


2. USE OF DATA


This information is required by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to determine whether a Qualified Insurance Company (QIC) is allowed to determine its income by using its own payment pattern data for a particular line of business. The information will be used on examination to determine whether a QIC is calculating its foreign loss payment patterns correctly.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


The IRS has no plans to provide electronic filing as these are recordkeeping requirements only.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.

5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


The collection of information requirement will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


The information will be used on examination to determine whether a QIC is calculating its foreign loss payment patterns correctly. A less frequent collection could affect federal programs or policy activities and result in an increase of significant hardships on taxpayers.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice (90 FR 8102), dated January 23, 2025.


9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, submissions under this notice are considered tax returns and tax return information, which are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. In general, certain matters relating to taxability and deductibility are disclosable under 26 U.S.C. 6110. In addition, certain matters described in this notice are disclosable under 26 U.S.C. 6104.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No personally identifiable information (PII) is collected.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Under section V (entitled Applicable Loss Payment Pattern) of Notice 2002-69, U.S. shareholders of a foreign insurance company may elect, provided certain conditions are satisfied, to calculate foreign insurance reserves of the companies using the company’s historical payment pattern data. U.S. shareholders making this election will be large U.S. insurance companies conducting business in foreign countries through controlled foreign corporations. We estimate that no more than 300 large insurance companies will need to make an annual submission with respect to their controlled foreign corporations. The estimated annual burden will be about one hour per respondent for a total 300 hours. The burden estimates are as follows:


Authority

Description

# of Respondents

#Responses per Respondent

Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Burden

IRC § 954(i)

Notice

2002-69

300

1

300

1

300

Total


300


300


300


13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.

14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There is no annualized cost to the federal government as these are recordkeeping requirements only. The government costs do not include any activities such as taxpayer assistance and enforcement.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis, and publication.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


IRS believes that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the notice sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

© 2025 OMB.report | Privacy Policy