Form Approved
OMB No 0920-1050
Exp. Date 6/30/2025
Due
Date:
{insert date}
In this evaluation, you will be asked to respond to questions and statements about the [Advanced Program Evaluation] training. Your responses will help program staff improve future trainings designed for the ASPPH/CDC Public Health Fellowship.
A primary focus of this course was to teach fellows how to use the CDC Program Evaluation Framework to connect each step of the framework with a section of an evaluation plan. This training also sought to provide the needed skills to identify strategies for addressing budget, time, data and political constraints in evaluation practice.
CDC estimates the average public reporting burden for this collection of information as 10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data/information sources, gathering and maintaining the data/information needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC/ATSDR Information Collection Review Office, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS H21-8, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; ATTN: PRA (0920-1050).
Please respond to the following questions and statements.
How relevant do you think the information from this training is to your fellowship position?
Not at all relevant
Slightly relevant
Moderately relevant
Very relevant
Extremely relevant
How well do you understand how to apply concepts described in this training?
Some significant confusion and/or blind-spots
A basic understanding
A solid understanding
A comprehensive understanding
An expert-level understanding
This training confirmed the importance of selecting evaluation approaches and theories appropriately.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
After this training, how well do you understand how to use systematic evidence to make evaluative judgments?
Some significant confusion and/or blind-spots
A basic understanding
A solid understanding
A comprehensive understanding
An expert-level understanding
This training increased your ability to reflect on an evaluation formally or informally to improve practice.
After this training, how well do you understand how to identify evaluation purposes and needs?
Some significant confusion and/or blind-spots
A basic understanding
A solid understanding
A comprehensive understanding
An expert-level understanding
This training increased your ability to design credible and feasible evaluations that address identified purposes and questions.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
This training expanded skills needed to determine and justify appropriate methods to answer evaluation questions, e.g., quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods..
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
This training demonstrated the need to identify assumptions that underlie methodologies and program logic.
True
False
This training highlighted the importance of involving partners in designing, implementing, interpreting, and reporting evaluations as appropriate.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
This training demonstrated methods to collect data using credible, feasible, and culturally appropriate procedures.
After this training, how well do you understand how to identify strengths and limitations of an evaluation’s design and methods?
Some significant confusion and/or blind-spots
A basic understanding
A solid understanding
A comprehensive understanding
An expert-level understanding
This training increased your ability to use evidence and interpretations to draw conclusions, making judgments and recommendations when appropriate.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
This training demonstrated the need to engage a diverse range of users/partners throughout the evaluation process.
True
False
This training demonstrated the need to describe a program, including its basic purpose, components, and its functioning in broader contexts.
True
False
After this training, how well do you understand how to communicate evaluation processes and results in timely, appropriate, and effective ways?
Some significant confusion and/or blind-spots
A basic understanding
A solid understanding
A comprehensive understanding
An expert-level understanding
After this training, how well do you understand how to negotiate and manage a feasible evaluation plan, budget, resources, and timeline?
Some significant confusion and/or blind-spots
A basic understanding
A solid understanding
A comprehensive understanding
An expert-level understanding
This training described methods to monitor evaluation progress and quality and makes adjustments when appropriate.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
This training confirmed the importance of managing and implementing safeguards for evaluation data.
This training demonstrated the need to foster positive relationships for professional practice and evaluation use.
True
False
This training increased skills needed to communicate in meaningful ways that enhance the effectiveness of the evaluation.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Would you like to provide any additional feedback about this training?
Are there any specific trainings you want PH LEADS to host in the future?
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Maccioli, Spencer (CDC/DDPHSS/CSELS/OD) (CTR) |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2025-05-19 |